Supper of Leonardo exists an other hidden picture all’interno dell’Ultima from Wins: new templari detections or simple pareidolia, that is l’associazione to shapes notes of accidental profiles? Here the video that explains what is looked at really in the Cenacolo

Last Supper of Slavisa Leonardo Fish From You win, as it is famous, used the specular writing that is the grafia that it comes spread with a course that goes from right on the left, “grafia sinistrorsa” , and that therefore mirror can be only deciphered to means of one.
And it is for this reason that a news, from the romanzesco sapore, than in these days is going around of the average and of the blog has attracted my attention: the 36enne technical computer science of Buttonhole, Slavisa Fish, to its to say would accidentally have made one discovered exceptional. While it leaf through the review of Sky, it is imbattuto in un’immagine of the Cenacolo (l’Ultima Supper of Leonardo from You gain) that from endured to it it is seemed strange, “una strange shadow to the center, like a book fotocopiato”. From here little simple steps: it has cut the folded photo and l’ha sull’asse of simmetria; too much small image. L’ha therefore magnified and printed publication one copy on paper and one on velina. Quest’ultima l’ha same and overlapped turn on if to that one on paper.
The result is a Cenacolo to say little “sconvolto”, like if Supper of Leonardo were hidden you all an other picture dell’Ultima from You win! It would be ennesima the confirmation of the genius of Leonardo!

According to Slavisa, if the same image is overlapped to the Last Supper, ribaltata and reproduced on a sheet traslucido, it is looked at to appear an other painting:
Giuda to scompare from the sight
it appears to templare in place of Saint Bartolomeo
the background mountains become crowns of two personages
the knife of Peter ends in the meat in the plate to the opposite side of the table
Jesus is dressed all of red
of forehead to Jesus one is materialized goblet
Filippo seems has in arm a child
many the particular, but, remain amazingly identical instead: the Christ and the table align themselves perfectly in the superimposition.

Chance? Slavisa has tried with other paintings of Leonardo and the result, to its to say, is the same one.

According to the supporters of these hypotheses, they are not simple coincidences but a number consisting of new not accidental images, evidently studied by piece from Leonardo that probably, with a system of complex calculations matemati to us, succeeded in only qualche.cosa of in order demonstrating its genius and putting to the test the observatories.

The discovery of the young person has been already deposited from the notary public and introduced to Palace of the Stelline of Milan.

Here under found the video truly very made, realized from the channel Italian Transactions of Free, that one explains l’intuizione of Fish (strange what to signal: in the video it is advised, for deepenings, to visit some situated Internet: www.leonardo2007.com, www.codicedavinci.tv, cenacolo.biz, www.leonardodavinci.tv. Well nobody of these is working! Probably they have been all as soon as it records to you: already marketing campaign is begun one in order to take advantage of the popolarità peak).

Therefore, after the fascinating hypotheses of Dan Brown in its Code From You win where skillfully ago lever on mystery, art, esoterismo and on symbols in sauce thriller, and that has had the pregio to ignite an interest of mass around the Cenacolo di Leonardo From Wins, new interpretation in key arrives one to templare, than in the light of the particular propensione of Leonardo to write to speculate, natural graphical evolution of its method of writing could seem one.

My doubt, but, is that also in this case we find ourselves of forehead to a case of pareidolia, that is that tendency, own to dell’essere human, to try outlines orders to you and familiar in the disorder, that same tendency that allows to notice dredges us in one cloud or a face in the surface of the Moon. Insomma I have the suspicion that also in this interpretation to templare of the Cenacolo di Leonardo From You win is falls to you in the tranello to lead back to shapes notes objects or profiles from the accidental shape.

While Vittorio Sgarbi, has already said its, in quality of City council member to the culture menegina, leaving very little space all’interpretazione:

[ … ] it is impossible that us they can be, in the painting, various persons from whom they are looked at. Only ignoring as a goat can introduce in the Last Supper elements that are not of ortodossia absolute. The only variations to the topic, in that work, are of compositivo type and regard the positions of Giuda and San Giovanni Evangelista. If there is a work on which not there is nothing to say, if not that Leonardo has painted it badly, it is the Cenacolo. If then with the rear-view mirror you see or less something, is your point of view, but it is not null that it has intentional Leonardo or that it has thought.

While the historian dell’arte Flavio Caroli declares, much more pacatamente, than:

The Last Supper not only provokes always great interest because it is a famous work, but because it is dense of it means to you and of foundations that we more do not succeed to interpret. It is a wonderful teatrale scene in which all it is carried out around the psychological reactions of the disciples, around that Leonardo called ‘i motions dell’anima’. It is a mysterious picture because it contains many thoughts. The genius from You win was one complex mind. It thinks and it realizes this its fundamental work concentrating in one image all the its knowledge.

Goodness knows, therefore, perhaps if beyond to the intentional distances of sense, it leaves the freedom to everyone to find some also of its!

You that of thoughts?


leonardodavinci.tv