Posted by: krrjhn
« on: 25. January 2011., 07:21:42 »Great news!!
Members
Total Members: 14197- Latest: Levine
Stats
- Total Posts: 43445
- Total Topics: 16537
- Online today: 2794
- Online ever: 51419
- (01. January 2010., 10:27:49)
Users Online
Posted by: Samker
« on: 18. August 2010., 07:44:36 »
Walt Disney's internet subsidiary and several of its partners have been sued for allegedly using cookies based on Adobe's Flash Player to track highly personal information about their users, many of whom were minors.
The LSOs, or locally shared objects are better known as Flash Cookies, and their ability to gather detailed user information over long periods of time without a trace has been understood since at least 2007. Now, attorneys representing people who browsed websites that employed the technology claim it was used to track them in ways that violate the sites' privacy policies.
For instance, the habits of one individual who browsed articles on depression, were uniquely tracked across a network of partners, according to the complaint.
The suit was filed in US District Court in Los Angeles against Walt Disney Internet Group, Clearspring Technologies, Warner Bros. Records, and several other companies that shared the cookies. The affiliates fail to adequately warn users about the information-sharing arrangement, which according to the complaint, allows “zombie cookies” to be restored even after a user has gone through the trouble of deleting them.
“Using Flash cookies to re-identify users overrides this control, with little available redress for users,” the complaint, which seeks class-action status, states. “Although users may arguably protect themselves by periodically deleting their Flash cookies as well, the means for doing so are extremely obscure and difficult even for savvy consumers to use. Flash specifically attempts to obfuscate data within each LSO by controlling the format and forcing a binary serialization of any stored data, thus bypassing the web browser's same-origin security policy, allowing an application hosted on one domain to read data or code hosted on another.”
A research paper (abstract here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1446862 ) released last year by UC Berkeley researchers famously exposed the ability of Flash cookies to surreptitiously “respawn” deleted cookies. It served as a wakeup call about the uncanny persistence of the tracking files. What's more, Flash cookies can store up to 100 KB of data, 25 times more than normal cookies.
The suit alleges the companies violated a raft of laws, including the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the California Computer Crime Law, the California Invasion of Privacy Act and trespass and personal property statutes. The complaint is here: http://regmedia.co.uk/2010/08/16/flash_cookie_complaint.pdf
Bootnote
To Adobe's defense, company officials have stated in comments (PDF) submitted to the FTC that their policy “condemns the practice of using Local Storage to back up browser cookies for the purpose of restoring them later without user knowledge and express consent”: http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/privacyroundtable/544506-00085.pdf
That's a great first step. Now the company should release a free consumer tool that makes it easy to manage and delete the new-fangled cookies.
(ElReg)