Posted by: mikey
« on: 03. June 2012., 22:01:52 »Quote
...recommend this analysis...
Cool
I know some of the folks who work on the 'front line' to put that data together. They're all volunteers from different realms of web dev.
Members
Total Members: 14197- Latest: Levine
Stats
- Total Posts: 43440
- Total Topics: 16532
- Online today: 3109
- Online ever: 51419
- (01. January 2010., 10:27:49)
Users Online
Cool
I know some of the folks who work on the 'front line' to put that data together. They're all volunteers from different realms of web dev.Posted by: Samker
« on: 03. June 2012., 08:29:20 »I agree with you Mike, also would like to recommend this analysis to SCF Members - "Top 50 Bad Hosts & Networks 2012 Q1": http://hostexploit.com/downloads/viewdownload/7/36.html
-
By the way, Stuxnet worm is mentioned in page 22. (or 23.) and here is new Topic related to them - "Operation Olympic Games - Obama confirms attack on Iran via Stuxnet worm": http://scforum.info/index.php/topic,7682.0.html
Posted by: mikey
« on: 01. June 2012., 23:17:41 »IMO as a researcher, 'take downs' have become much easier in recent years. There are many reasons but I think this comment sums it up;
src; http://hostexploit.com/blog/14-reports/3537-disrupting-cybercrime-via-hosts-and-isps.html
Quote
Recent disruptions of cybercriminal operations - the result of cross-industry and international cooperation - show signs of a new willingness to target supporting infrastructures as the enablers of cybercriminal operations.
src; http://hostexploit.com/blog/14-reports/3537-disrupting-cybercrime-via-hosts-and-isps.html