Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 43374
  • Total Topics: 16478
  • Online today: 2687
  • Online ever: 51419
  • (01. January 2010., 10:27:49)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 2675
Total: 2675









Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Second Anti-Bot trap, type or simply copy-paste below (only the red letters):www.scforum.info:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Jemne123
« on: 07. June 2023., 04:03:10 »

Hi everyone, I’m a crypto newbie and I’m trying to understand the difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work consensus algorithms. I’ve heard that proof-of-work is very energy-intensive and harmful for the environment, while proof-of-stake is more energy-efficient and eco-friendly. Can someone explain to me how they work and why they have different environmental impacts? From what I’ve learned so far, proof-of-work requires miners to compete to solve complex mathematical problems and validate transactions on the blockchain. This consumes a lot of electricity and generates a lot of heat and waste. Proof-of-stake, on the other hand, requires validators to stake their coins and randomly select them to validate transactions on the blockchain. This consumes much less electricity and hardware, and rewards validators for holding their coins rather than spending them. Is this correct? Which one do you prefer and why?

Enter your email address to receive daily email with 'SCforum.info - Samker's Computer Forum' newest content:

Kursevi kodiranja za ucenike u Sarajevu

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertising
TinyPortal 2.3.1 © 2005-2023