to end all discussions (which I didn't read, for I don't like Firewall :>)... Proactive Security Challenge 64 awards
http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge-64/results.php)
Link by "Fubar" on
http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/sterjo-portable-firewall28/ .
Only TWO products get a recommended - ALL others FAIL (miserably). Can you guess which two?
This is especially worrisome when you look closely at the players that fail. All big names. Avast. Kaspersky. Norton. G-Data. McAfee. Rising. The list goes on :(
Online Armor was not mentioned in this test.
Detailed reports are downloadable as pdf. Reading the details might even change my mind about firewalls... They do seem to be a very good add-on for virusprotection. The nasties not catched by the regular antivirus engine, might be catched by the firewall. I would not have expected this. But us Fubar points out righteously, the best firewall solutions come with 100 a 150MB of binary code... It must do something ;p
Time to take a critical look at the "pinned" solutions with scforum? ; )
Enjoy!
Devvie
~~~ notemail@facebook.com ~~~
Cuisvis hominis est errare, nullius nisi insipientis in errore persevare
——
All spelling mistakes are my own and may only be distributed under the GNU General Public License! – (© 95-1 by Coredump; 2-012 by DevNullius)